Truth, Science and Grumpy the Dwarf
Last night my wife and daughter returned from their week-lone expedition to Los Angeles. They brought me home from Disneyland a T-shirt they felt summarized my dominant philosophy. It pictures Grumpy and bears the caption, "I'm right. You're wrong. Any questions?"
Today that sentiment appears to be popular. I was enheartened recently (and I am not enheartened often these days) by a circuit court decision striking down the Cobb County Georgia school board's (not, I stress, not the county I live in) decision to include in science textbooks the disclaimer:
This textbook contains material on evolution. Evolution is a theory, not a fact, regarding the origin of living things. This material should be approached with an open mind, studied carefully and critically considered.Apparently the school board's civics textbooks conveniently left out:
Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion...What has me the most distressed is a sort of insidious relativism that has become pervasive. The justification for the disclaimer by the Cobb legislators was that there were parental protests about the teaching of evolution. Reality is what the majority of people, or at least a vocal minority say it is. Pilate's "What is truth?" is answered by "What do a vocal minority think it is?"
The issue is no whether one theory or another is correct, as proponents of Intelligent Design a disingenuous attempt to relabel a strict interpretation of the bible to provide cover for fundamentalists say it is. We have seen scientific differences and debates such as the Big Bang versus Steady State theory of the universe. What is fundamentally at issue is the very notion of falsifiability essential to science. No scientist will tell you that there could not be new evidence tomorrow that would radically reshape thoughts on evolution. Now that is not to say that anyone finds it plausible and more than we would expect something to radically shake the foundations of electromagnetism. However, to the true believer there is no possible scenario that could falsify the idea that everything came into existence in one big poof. Of course I have my personal doubts as to the benevolence of a creator who would leave traces of a deep and consistent timeline only as some sort of test to see which secularists need to be sent to purgatory.
In some sense the Internet is the epitome of a kind of divided reality. Surveys have shown that a majority of people who votes for the president in the last election believe that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, and that he played a major role in 9/11 (Harris Poll October 2004: http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=508, Program on International Policy and Attitudes 6/4/03 http://www.pipa.org/whatsnew/html/new_6_04_03.html).
What I find most telling about the above results was that until I did a search to get the baseline, I fully admit these were "facts" I had heard and had reason to want to believe. I do not wish to be guilty of casting the first stone. We cannot dismiss the proponents of this sort of relativism as simply uninformed. They are definitely misinformed and the continuation of the current administration for four more years shows that there are definitely beneficiaries to these misconceptions.
The evolution "debate" is important in many regards. First, it is most definitely not a clash between a good and bad scientific theory, but rather it has the potential to confuse and undermine a generation's understanding of the whole scientific process. Even for schools without stickers, the debate has made enough of an impression that many students accept praying as a substitute for studying and fail to recognize any established canon of scientific thought. More than this, it represents another brick in the wall for a tidal wave of opinion that reality can be what you want it to be or, what is more chilling for a democracy, what a powerful group of people can persuade you it is. Let us hope we do not give up the fight.
